Brilliant.
<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:26 PM, Roland Francis <[email protected]> wrote: > Cliff Richard wins £210,000 in damages over BBC privacy case | Media | The > Guardian > > It’s not what they did, for after all they had an allegation from a man > about being sexually assaulted years ago, but how they did it. The BBC even > submitted their footage for an award which action the judge considered > deserving of additional punitive damages. > > In this age of wild allegations and public shaming without charges being > proven, I personally am glad that Sir Cliff Richard was compensated £210K > with a Yorkshire Police separately settled £400K. > > Now if only the Sisters of Charity sued the Jharkhand Police and > Children’s Welfare for a similar amount on behalf of the unwed mothers who > were dragged in a raid from the Nirmal Hriday premises to the police > station in violation of their privacy. Also a large sum for endangering new > born babies’ welfare - the very task with which Jharkhand’s CWC is > entrusted. > > https://www.theguardian.com/music/2018/jul/18/cliff- > richard-wins-damages-from-bbc-over-police-raid-footage > > Roland Francis > Toronto. > >
