I reproduce Edward Desilva's message 7, dtd 26th January 2008 along with my views:
Your first Para: I fully support what Selma wrote. The Selma's text that you reproduced. I don't see her pointing a finger at the 'cars' or 'kars' of Goa who have been to Catholic schools in Goa but the 90% of the BJP/RSS supporters in Goa who have not been humanly educated. My Views: I think you are making a mistake in saying so....probably only to extend your support to Selma... Your second Para: And, the Porrikars who have been educated by the catholic system are not doing Goans any favour by sitting on the fence. My views: Here again I think you are wrong. For, if they play.. you have millions of questions to ask WHY they are playing. Have they got any hidden agenda? & if they don't play still you have thousands if not millions of questions to put forwards like WHY are they sitting on the fence. What's this Edward! Your third Para: For you to take a personal hurt for what she said determines that you are one of the members of the RSS Elite Group who fund the training of these young vulnerable youths (non don boscos) to do the dirty work for you, while you write sweet sacrosanct letters to avoid detection and throw us off the scent. My Views: Here you are trying to kill two birds in one shoot! Accusing some one and pointing Bosco. I assure you, give me the proof that you are holding and I will see that I will file a complaint and take it to logical conclusion. That's my word for you...if you cannot support with proof ...I would say you are firing bullets in air like Selma and trying to draw Net attention to you OR trying to draw attention to something else other than the point in question! Your Fourth Para: There is no smoke without fire, and there is evidence that during the election Porrikar brought BJP/RSS thugs from outside to create trouble in Goa. THERE IS EVIDENCE. Go back to Goanet archives and you will find it there. My views: For sure there cannot be smoke without fire..forget about new technology that produces fire first and than the smoke...my reply would be as mentioned above and that what is written on the Net achieves will never be accepted as proof in law matters. So if you have proof that you are holding under RTI or any other substantiating proof please pass it on to me at my address as mentioned in Goanet messaging. You're concluding words: ED. My concluding words: Best regards; Dr. U. G. Barad
