re: Sidis and the Daman bridge Bondoll which jc contested Frederick Noronha wrote the following:
1: JC's largely correct in the details. 2: But the way he won't let go of these examples for years together == o Senhor Frederico, IF I did not know you personally to be a very decent person, I would have done the "Rajan Parrikar" on you - IF I knew how to. Having said that, and having noticed the little samba you are doing here, May I ask you to please advise me re 1: If jc is "largely correct in the details" - where is jc incorrect? re 2: WHO exactly resurrected "these examples" in 2008? jc or FN? What is wrong with these "samba" folks .... Are they going to light a fire and then blame someone else? Yes ....even a non-recently-graduated lawyer should know better! BTW: Did you ever condone (on GoaNet) the non-correction of the Bondollam? You agree with me, do you not, that they were Bondollam? Are you saying that educated people should tolerate Bondollam? Once again ....No Samba please. jc
