Dear Gilbert,
 
First let us contextualize your question: this is a discussion on your 
comparison of the infamous INQUISITION with mediaval MEDICAL PRACTICES, in 
order to JUSTIFY  the former. Dr. Santosh Helkar, had rightly challenged this 
odious comaparison and I had supported his view.
 
If a 30 year male breaks into my home, assaults a member of my family and 
decamps with jewellery, then the correct English and legal word for it is 
ROBBERY, not STEALING. Stealing is when the act is done UNKNOWN to the other.
 
My personal choices as punishment for the Robber would depend on the reason for 
the robbery, the circumstances  and the robber's state of mind at the time of 
the act. Some men get boistrous when drunk and are repentent when sober. The 
problem is alcoholism, not criminal bent of mind. It would meet my ends of 
justice if this man a] returns the robbed jewellery, b] apologises to the 
person he assaulted and c] undergoes a rehab treatment for alcololism in a 
recognised rehab facility. No other punishment is needed as far as I am 
concerned. If he has confessed his crime, repentence cannot be far behind. I 
would go by the judgement of the lady judge in Australia while sentencing a 
teenager for hacking into international computer system. this man may have a 
great career ahead ...like Saul turned Paul. [See Acts 9:1 ff]
 
If the man is a seasoned criminal, with a history of crime, his past actions 
and his psycholigical profile will need to be considered before determining 
what needs to be done. Just imprisonment, rigorous or simple, solves nothing 
....and one gains nothing from the loss of a man who could have been someone's 
son, brother, father instead of just being in jail.
 
Of course, If I was to seem this man immediately after the assualt, I might 
want to hammer the daylights out of him. That would be my anger at work, not a 
calculated means of correcting the wrong. The Grand Judges of the Inquisition 
had no cause for anger. They went about their work methodically over a lng 
period of time. Worst of all, they blasphemed Jesus Christ who died on the 
cross for our sins  ...when actually he should have crucified Judas for 
betraying him, Peter for denying him and abused his desciples for falling 
asleep while he was suffering and praying in the Garden of Olives.
 
The Women's rights and other organisations wanted the five boys who were 
accused of raping an Art College student to be castrated. It was later found 
that the girl was not raped at all. Several priests in USA and now in Australia 
have been proven to have molested young boys and girls who were entrusted in 
their care. One case that has been highlighted is of one priest RAPING TWO 
SISTERS REPEATEDLY WHEN THEY WERE STILL CHILDREN in Australia. The World Youth 
Day has only served to bring that in deep focus. Who would blame the people if 
they thought like the Women's groups in Goa? What would YOU suggest as the 
appropriate punishment for those proven to have molested or raped or both in 
this context??? Would YOU send your recommendation in writing to the Pope, the 
guardian of the Christian values on Earth? Would YOU justify an Inquisition of 
the Clergy the world over, including your current parish? Inquisition was 
justified as a means to maintain the
 PURITY of belief. It seems to be needed now more than then.
 
It is a pity that Dr. Santosh Helekar, a professed atheist/agnostic 
rationalist, should actually bring home the point of what is essentially a 
CHRISTian belief:REPENTENCE , not punishment, as the first option. No one can 
claim to be Christian and justify Inquisition at the same time. That is akin to 
storing ice-cubes in Hell.
 
Mog asundi.
 
Miguel
 
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 04:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gilbert Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Goanet] Evaluating the Past
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Hi Miguel,
So let me ask your (and anybody else who would like to volunteer their) 
opinion. This is a special invitation to attorneys and those in the 
law-and-order (police) field. 

A 30 year old male robber breaks into your home. He steals the jewelry, 
physically assaults a member of your family and flees.? The robber is caught 
and confesses to the crime. His guilt is beyond doubt.

What would be your suggestions as to the appropriate punishment for this 
robber? Please provide the punishment options in decreasing order of 
preference.? No long explanations needed.? This is not a trick question and the 
answers need not be tricky or complicated.
?
Thanks in anticipation to you (and others) for your cooperation.
Regards, GL
?
?
------------- Miguel Braganza 

"But go and learn what it means 'I will have mercy and not sacrifice'; for I 
have not come to call the righteous but the sinners to repentance." Matthew 
9:13 New Testament .... Mog asundi. Miguel






      Get an email ID as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Click here 
http://in.promos.yahoo.com/address

Reply via email to