Fr. Ivo wrote: > >Your "scientific method" cannot be used, as you only admit. Even now I >cannot >understand "your method" for such cases. About your "scientific >method", it >is the method to be used for common clinical cases. >
The barrage of posts that Fr. Ivo has unleashed on this forum are doing serious damage to the cause of scientific literacy. He does not understand the simple fact that science has nothing to do with his religion or anybody else's religion. The amount of mangling and mixing of science he has done with his own theology and religious beliefs is simply mind-boggling. The one saving grace is that he has finally admitted (see above) that he does not understand the scientific method. That is why he will never be able to comprehend such things as how the shroud of Turin has been demonstrated to be a 13th century fabrication, or the fact that he is doing a disservice to science and to the scientific community by using scientific ignorance rather than pure faith as a prop to validate his particular supernatural beliefs. Cheers, Santosh Fr. Ivo wrote: > > Science has not > proved through all tests that the Shroud of Turin is a > fake. There are > difficulties, but they have been answered by scientists. >
