--- On Thu, 9/11/08, Fr. Ivo C da Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Consulted by ZENIT, Dr.Odoardo Linoli explained that "as regards the >flesh, I >had in my hand the endocardium. Therefore, there is no doubt at >all that it >is cardiac tissue." >
The above claim belies the denial below: > > ***This I have not learned from the Internet, but from historical books >and > from Theology. > This is a good example of another blatant contradiction. ZENIT is a religious news website, not a historical book. Here is the link to that site: http://www.zenit.org/article-12933?l=english It is simple for anybody to understand that historical books, religious websites and theological publications are not credible sources of scientific information. And yet, Fr. Ivo relies on them for his "scientific" knowledge, and believes without the least amount of skepticism everything that they say. The fact that these non-scientific sources cannot impart legitimate knowledge of science is strikingly evident from the following astounding question of Fr. Ivo: "Historical evidence is not scientific evidence?" .....Fr. Ivo It appears that all it takes for Fr. Ivo to claim that something is scientific is merely the fact of its having been written in some old historical or parochial theological document. Regarding the rest of the rehashed material in his latest post, the contradictions and errors in it have already been pointed out before. Cheers, Santosh
