Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:22:55 -0700 (PDT) From: ralph rau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Along with the other flawed pro-US and pro-Christianity writings the fertile award winning imagination of this niz Goenkar has produced (like What's so Great About America), I stumbled across one of his earliest "seminal" works
The End of Racism: Principles for a Multiracial Society. Here is a critique: http://www.vdare.com/pb/dsouza.htm Putting stray thoughts & cogitations into print with some slick editing- Dinesh discovered early on the path to millionaire land. Write a book with a feel good factor and inherent human (American?) bigotry will ring in the profits. > Mario wonders: > Hey, Ralph, > Slow day, hanh?! "Stumbled across" is right, or did you Google "pro-US and pro-Christianity books" looking to express some pent up anti-US and anti-Christianity sentiments? > This book was written 13 years ago, man. > Whatever you think of Dinesh D'Souza and his polemics that challenge the absurd liberal notion that American blacks are inferior and need the coercive hand of a Nanny Government to prop them up - the very philosophy that keeps dragging them down - no one who has read his books would accuse him of "flinching" from anything in expressing his opinions. In fact, he is mostly accused of attacking, not flinching, which this reviewer seems to see in this book, while also writing, "In The End of Racism, D'Souza takes many courageous stands; his book has a powerful major argument and endlessly fascinating detail." > He seems to be accusing Dinesh of "courageously flinching", which is almost like your title implying that Dinesh is "stupidly brilliant":-)) > The reviewer started off on the wrong foot with me early on when he says that Danielle D'Souza, Dinesh's daughter, is "...is not at all beyond racial classification --" and says the child is "...of essentially the same provenance as the Anglo-Indian community...". > Danielle D'Souza's American background includes the following ethnicities, Indian, English, Scotch Irish, German, and American Indian. Classifying her as an Anglo-Indian is quite a stretch in my opinion. > The reviewer accuses Dinesh of engaging in the "frequently expressed hope that a couple of generations' intermarriage will make the whole question go away." Then he writes "It is precisely the most diverse societies that become the most obsessed with minute gradations of human type, not least because these different human types tend to gravitate to different social levels." > Anyone familiar with US society would know that it is, in fact, intermarriage that is diluting racism in America, and it is by virtue of intermarriage that it is virtually impossible to tell what an average, multi-generation American's ethnic make-up happens to be, thus making each individual ethnic background moot with each passing generation. > It is those who lack diversity in their American backgrounds that are more likely to gravitate to different social levels, especially those with a high percentage of American slave blood, which is the group whose collective necks the liberals have put a millstone around by deciding they need the coercive hand of Nanny Government to help protect them ostensibly from chronic "racism" by white Caucasian Americans, ostensibly because they cannot help themselves, which is absurd. > The experience of African Americans who do not have slave blood, like Colin Powell and Barack Obama for example, as well as the growing number of Americans with slave blood who have broken out of the dependencies that the liberals seek to impose on them are doing at least as well as anyone else in America. > And if "racism" by while Caucasians is endemic in America, how did it come to pass that the top three ethnic groups when ranked by family income in this most competitive of all countries are Japanese, Indians and Filipinos, none representing the white Caucasian race? >
