Miguel wrote: Adv. Aires will claim that two of his fingers are injured and, while he can handle a Press Conference in the hospital, he could not jog anyones mammary! ;-) That is a good alibi as any.
Hear tell that the priest harrassed by Adv. Aires had a e-motional break down and was in Bengalooru [as they now call Bangalore again]. That is collateral damage for the greater glory of the patriots in Goa. Earlier JC had asked a question: IF one of the "goons" decides to complain to the Police that Aires molested (any) 14 year old's breasts. May I ask, HOW Aires would go about proving that He had NOT touched her breasts? -- Dear Miguelbab, The greater glory of the Goan patriots having been noted, political and financial expediency appears to be the modus operandi. What again was the charge Aires made against the priest he harassed? Where was Aires at the time the alleged incident is "alleged" to have happened? Which PUBLIC mass was the priest celebrating at the time when the alleged incident is "alleged" to have happened? BTW Miguelbab ... My question about Aires' alleged breast touching of a 14 year old girl (fictitious case) has NOT been answered.. Does one have to jog another's 'memory' to be accused of child molestation ? And could it not be said (in defence) that the goon beat up Aires because the goon "saw" or "thought he saw" Aires touching some 14 year old girl's breasts? How will Aires prove that he did not do that ? Can we (Aires included) not see the madness of our ways? jc http://lists.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet-goanet.org/2007-November/065094.html airesrod <airesrodrigues at yahoo.com> wrote: Goa's Roman Catholic Church might have been able to wriggle out of the Ribandar Church molestation case by Fr. Newton Rodrigues and the late Fr. Eusebio Ferrao episode but this time the Goan Roman Catholic Church may find it hard to grapple with this latest startling revelation by Goa's Congress party. jc's comment: It is quite strange that a person with legal qualifications should make statements like the one above. I ask: 1: was the Goa Roman Catholic Church a "party" to the alleged molestation case that Aires is all about ....all over again? 2: what was/is Aires' relationship to Fr. Newton Rodrigues? 3: what was/is Aires' relationship to any person who may have wanted a business contract from Fr. Newton Rodrigues? 4: what was the court's decision in this case? 5: Will Aires deny (on Goanet) that he did make threatening phone calls to the nuns in Old Goa? 6: Will Aires advise us WHY he took a 'sabbatical' or leave of absence from Goa - after the nuns allegedly accused him of assault (I am being kind here)? PS: I have zero problems with anybody (priest, IT consultant, lawyer or liar) being held accountable for impropriety and irregularity. I do have a problem with the Aireses of this world continuing to try cases thrown out by the courts - in the public arena - over and over again. jc
