--- On Tue, 4/21/09, Marshall Mendonza <[email protected]> wrote: > > Then why do you habitually keep doing it doc? Why do you > not practice what you preach? >
The above insinuation is a blatant falsehood. I have many faults, but this is not one of them. I have never gratuitously publicly abused or slandered any private citizen. I have only defended myself by telling like it is, and calling a spade a spade when people like Marshall have abused and slandered me. Furthermore, when I exposed the misdeeds of my abusers, or expressed an adverse opinion against them I have provided evidence to back up my claims. I have also exposed habitual abusers in public forums by providing factual evidence against them. I have never attacked anybody who has not attacked me first. Please see what constitutes defamation in a public forum, and the exceptions for criticism and slander of public figures and for adverse fact-based opinions expressed against others in self defense and in public interest. http://www.tax4india.com/indian-laws/criminal-law/defamation/defamation.html Please note that under this law Marshall can be prosecuted or sued for gratuitous defamation of Shrikant for the following: http://lists.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet-goanet.org/2009-April/176514.html Cheers, Santosh P.S. I relish the opportunity to substantiate what I have stated above by using specific examples that Marshall is about to copy and paste from the archives.
