When will Gilbert understand that some of us respond to his posts only when he makes derogatory, factually erroneous or silly comments in them, especially gratuitous demeaning comments directed against other Goanetters? I have explained this to him on several occasions, as has Mario lately. But he simply does not get it. As far as the lay scientific material he has posted regarding the brain from popular media sources is concerned, I would be happy to answer any questions on it, if anybody has cared to read it in the first place.
Cheers, Santosh --- On Sat, 5/23/09, Gilbert Lawrence <[email protected]> wrote: > > The last post of mine on this thread > generated some interesting responses. Of course, NONE of > the responses related to "the real purpose of this post > ...." (see below). The responses we read were the > classic, "Catch the bull by the tail", and a good excuse to > whip-up more posts. All I saw was one responder who > never stops being angry; and the other who never stops > being right. > > I thought a response from Santosh would have expanded on > neuroplaticity. But perhaps that aspect may not be a field > he could significantly add, to what was already said by the > experts. Yet this specific subject was an opportunity for > him to display his professional talent, while standing on > his own two feel. > > Mario had an interesting point about the benefit of social > connecting to preserve cognition. Can that be an > explanation about the who and why (the individuals) are on > Goanet? > > Any post on this and other threads that is not confined to > the substance of the thread is merely a "bait" to continue > with the thread ad-nausea. The only caution - verbal > helium is a dangerous thing.:=)) > Regards, GL >
