------------------------------------------------------------------------
* G * O * A * N * E * T *** C * L * A * S * S * I * F * I * E * D * S *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sangath, www.sangath.com, is looking to build a centre for services, training 
and research and seeks to buy approx 1500 to 2000 sq mtrs land betweeen Mapusa 
and Bambolim and surrounding rural areas. Please contact: [email protected] 
or [email protected] or ph+91-9881499458
http://lists.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet-goanet.org/2009-July/180028.html

------------------------------------------------------------------------

This continuation of homophobic propaganda in the post appended below nicely 
illustrates the conflict of interest that I had pointed out earlier in respect 
of the claim by religious priests of fighting for human rights, and for 
minorities and oppressed people. It reveals to us why religious priests and 
organizations cannot be trusted to fight for the rights of minorities. They are 
primarily motivated by their religious ideology, not by concerns about the life 
and health of people who happen to be homosexual in sexual orientation.

Any rational person would understand that the material copied and pasted below 
from the website of a religious agency serves a homophobic religious agenda, 
and has absolutely no scientific value. In most cases the paraphrased 
statements in the material itself and the conclusions drawn from them are 
unscientific and irrational. Indeed, they are simply wrong from the standpoint 
of secular morality and common sense.

For example, no sane and responsible person would claim that a certain social 
group is immoral and criminal because its members are more prone to commit 
suicide or to suffer from depression. Such a claim would be absurd, if for 
nothing else then because, on this basis, an unscrupulous ideologue with an 
Anti-Christian agenda can claim that Christianity is immoral and criminal 
compared to Judaism, Islam and Buddhism because scientific studies have shown 
that Christians have a higher suicide rate than adherents of the latter 
religions. All he has to do is cherry-pick and cite these studies.

Here are the reasons why the copied and pasted material from the religious 
website in question is an assault on our rationality and sanity:

1. As indicated above, the claim that homosexuality is immoral and criminal 
because of any kind of scientific evidence is fundamentally irrational, 
irresponsible and illiberal.

2. None of the papers cited makes a claim on any rational or scientific grounds 
that homosexuality is immoral and criminal because of what has been reported.

3. The references have been cherry-picked in a lawyerly fashion for the ignoble 
purpose of anti-homosexual advocacy, mischaracterizing the original findings 
and ignoring the fact that other scientific studies have refuted many of the 
claims. Scientific objectivity, honesty and ethical responsibility would 
prohibit any scientist from doing such a thing.

4. Most of the claims made are false representations of the findings of the 
original papers.

5. Many of the claims made have been directly contradicted by other scientific 
studies.

6. Some of the references cited as "research articles" have nothing to do with 
science or research of any kind. They are actually opinions of the gay 
journalist Andrew Sullivan and the right-wing commentator Stanley Kurtz.

Cheers,

Santosh

Fr. Ivo wrote:
>
>***I have "copied and pasted" from Catholic Answers and Catholic News 
>Agency, where I found the reference to research articles: C. Bagley and >P. 
>Tremblay, "Suicidal Behaviors in Homosexual and Bisexual Males," >Crisis 18 
>(1997): 24-34; R. A. Garofalo et al., "The Associations Between >Health Risk 
>Behaviors and Sexual Orientation Among a School-Based Sample >of Adolescents," 
>Pediatrics 101 (1998): 895-902; .............
>.............................
>Stanley Kurtz, "What Is Wrong with Gay Marriage," 
>Commentary, September 2000, 35-41; Andrew Sullivan, Virtually Normal: An 
>Argument About Homosexuality (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1995);.........
>....................
>As you all see, the information used by the author of the article comes >from 
>scientific research articles:
>


      

Reply via email to