This illegality is here to stay
HERALD REPORTER
PANJIM, DEC 5

Who is most corrupt? Is it the village panchayats or government officials? This 
question has become a subject matter of debate ever since the Government 
proposed an 
amendment to the Goa Panchayati Raj Act.

While the Government cites rampant corruption in the village panchayats for 
bringing 
about an amendment to the Act, Herald has in its possession documents showing 
how a 
highly placed government officer gave a clean chit to an illegal construction 
in 
2005 by by-passing the village panchayat.

Today the construction stands tall (see photo) abutting a major district road 
at 
Tumbabhatt, Macasana, Salcete, and the efforts of the village panchayat to stop 
it 
have all borne no fruit.

On April 5, 2005, then Deputy Director of Panchayats (South) Sandhya Kamat in a 
show-cause notice had ruled that the said construction was not illegal. 
Surprisingly, the same day, a little earlier, in the first show cause notice 
she 
branded the construction as illegal.

Why the deputy director had a change of mind is not known. It was later learnt 
that 
Kamat had realised the property in which the construction was coming up was 
sold by 
her and her husband. As a result she was compelled to change the show-cause 
notice.

This paper has in its possession the copy of the sale deed on which figures the 
name 
of the deputy director and her husband.

The construction has come up in spite of the Town and Country Planning 
Department, 
Margao, directing stoppage of work at the site. The PWD which earlier issued a 
no 
objection certificate to the construction from the structural point of view 
later 
withdrew the same on learning of the illegality.

Earlier the panchayat had moved for demolition of the construction, but got no 
cooperation from the police. The police told the panchayat to get a letter from 
the 
Block Development Officer.

The sarpanch thus became a hapless victim running from one government office to 
another to get the illegal construction removed. In spite of the construction’s 
illegality, it continued and today stands tall.


http://oheraldo.in/pagedetails.asp?nid=30766&cid=26



Reply via email to