Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 10:46:53 -0500
From: Venantius J Pinto <[email protected]>

"Dr. Tiller was a very gentle man to my husband and me. He wasn't the
villain that people, me included, had often painted him. He was soft-spoken. He 
held our hands while we mourned our loss. He even prayed with us."

http://www.alternet.org/story/144396/what_happened_when_an_anti-choice_catholic_woman_needed_an_abortion_at_dr._tiller's_clinic?page=2

Mario observes:

I'm not sure what the insinuation is here by referring to a Catholic woman 
faced with a horrific problem of a foetus that was seriously ill in her womb 
and not expected to survive, as "anti-choice".

The "choice" being referred to is the choice of aborting an unwanted human 
life, mostly for convenience.  If you look at the websites of the foremost 
pro-abortion organizations in the US, the "choice" of adoption, the only 
win-win option in such cases, is never mentioned.

Dr. George Tiller was one of the most vicious legal killers of late term unborn 
babies in the history of the US, eventually earning the nickname, "Tiller The 
Baby Killler".  He may have been a "very gentle man" as many other killers have 
also been, but he was making millions while doing just enough to skirt the law 
requiring a second medical opinion by using a person on his payroll to provide 
it.  Most Obstetrecians, even those who perform early term abortions, would 
never dream of doing what Tiller did routinely.

http://www.dr-tiller.com/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Tiller

Dr. Tiller was eventually assassinated by an anti-abortion fanatic, which was 
as wrong as all the mostly healthy late-term foetuses that were well on their 
way to living until they were brutally killed by him. 

Regarding the woman referred to here, this was not a simple choice to abort a 
foetus for the sake of personal convenience as most abortions are given the 
freely available option these days of giving up a baby for adoption through the 
Sisters of Charity or any number of Catholic and Protestant organizations.

This woman's foetus had serious medical complications and was not expected to 
survive as the following excerpt from the article linked to illustrates:

Quote:
Gail would be forced to deliver her child through c-section, as the stress of a 
traditional birth would be too much for their baby's body to handle. Their baby 
would need to be on life-support machines for months until able to have the 
surgeries required that could repair the damage of the child's suffocated heart 
and remove the masses from the undeveloped lung. As painful was it was for the 
Andersons to hear that this child they wanted so badly might not live even 
after the surgeries intended to repair damage, they were forced to make a 
decision that not only challenged their personal strength, but where they fit 
into their Catholic faith.
Unquote:

Reply via email to