To Goanet -

"We were happy.  But we wanted to be happy and rich.  That 
was a mistake." - an Icelandic woman. 

That quote comes from "Meltdown Iceland," a book I have just 
finished reading.  (See - http://tinyurl.com/meltdowniceland)
The island went bankrupt last year, the first major casualty
of the global economic turmoil.   

Iceland is a place of astounding natural beauty, with
haunting landscapes the kind you don't see anywhere 
else on earth, and it remains the last unpolluted wilderness 
on the planet.  I have had the good fortune of visiting it.  
The air is so crisp & clear that from the Reykjavik
harbour, mountains 100 miles out appear as if they are only 
a couple of miles away.  The fish in Iceland's waters is so
fresh and free of contaminants that no American can dream 
of having anything of the sort on his dinner plate (Alaskans 
excepted). 

But Iceland today has been socked by a double whammy.  
It declared bankruptcy last year, having bought into the 
mirage of economic prosperity supported on a pack of 
cards.  Many Icelanders who thought that they had made
good are now left with no money and a ton of debt.  And 
the country must deal with the new and advancing menace 
of large environment-destroying global corporations 
eyeing its rich resources.  The situation is grave enough 
that a campaign to save Iceland has been inaugurated. 

See - http://savingiceland.puscii.nl/?language=en 

There are a total of only 300,000 Icelanders, an endogenous
community, most of them related by blood.   It is tempting to 
draw similarities between the situation in Iceland and that in Goa.  
But there are a couple of crucial differences (there are many 
more - such as, Iceland still has men in public life with a sense 
of shame - but we shall focus on the ones that discourage 
mass immigration). 

One is the unforgiving weather.  Except for the months June, July, 
and Aug, Iceland can be a harsh place to be.   For the second 
difference, you have to look at the map.  Iceland is located 
in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean surrounded by its
icy waters.  You can't simply board a train and get in, and 
furthermore, there is strict control on admittance.  

With only 300,000 natives, Icelanders recognize that their 
identity is precarious and that they cannot allow an 
unchecked stream of outsiders coming in (their "ghatis" 
are the Eastern Europeans). 

The quote at the beginning of this post reminded me of my
own father's recent refrain about Goa & Goans: "We did not 
have much but we were content.  We had peace & quiet.  Now 
we have all this money but there is unrest in our lives."  

I said to him that he is the lucky one.  Now 88 years old, he 
is unlikely to be around when the final nail in Goa's coffin is 
hammered in.  Whereas we, who still have some miles left
before we run dry, will have to deal with the shocks to 
our system. 

Right now what we have in Goa is a zero-sum situation.  
With very limited resources of land area, water, and 
power, the system has a finite carrying capacity.  The 
effect of stressing this capacity beyond its limit has 
adverse consequences for EVERY SINGLE GOAN, regardless 
of his financial position.  And WE ARE ALREADY BEYOND 
THAT LIMIT. 

We have thus far enjoyed a relatively good quality of 
life because of our small numbers.  But that is rapidly 
changing with the mass influx of ghatis, as well as other
outsiders seeking homes and apartments.  Every single 
outsider coming into Goa results in a subtraction in 
the net quality of life for everyone.  Every apartment in a
mega-project means that much less for the native Goan.
For every newcomer contributes to the traffic & garbage, 
the use of roads & public spaces, water, power and food 
consumption, and other services.  And he parks on limited 
land, legally or illegally.  It is, as I said, a zero-sum situation.  

With every incoming Indian, you have to sacrifice a portion 
of your own quality of life, both in real resource terms and 
in other less-measurable ways.   The conclusion is inescapable.  
We can hang on to the kind of life we have been accustomed 
to (although it is already diminished by now) only by denying 
entry to others seeking a permanent home here.    

When I say quality of life, I am not talking luxuries.  
I mean something very basic.  Like the opportunity to take 
a quiet walk without the sight of paan and gutka spit 
on the sidewalk, ghatis loitering, or without being assaulted
by professional beggars.  The ability to cross Panjim in 
5 minutes end-to-end - increasingly tough with all the 
zillion new apartments in Dona Paula.  And so on. 

So - we have to close the gates.  That is the cold truth. 
You may not like the sound of it but you cannot wish away
the consequences of inaction.  Think Mumbai, and the toilet
that it is.  The only real debate should be on the options 
available to us. 

To the outsider who may react indignantly to this, I ask: 
Where do YOU get the nerve to expect us Goans to sacrifice 
our quality of life to accommodate you?  You talk about 
the Indian constitution.  Did Goans have any representation 
or say in it?  No!  Yet you wave the constitution at us when 
all we wish to do is protect what we have had. 

Therefore - along with the issues of mega-projects, land 
conversion, and mining, we have to address the issue of
in-migration.  You cannot view these in isolation. 

Otherwise, as George Pinto says, Goa RIP. 


Warm regards, 


r 

Reply via email to