From: "J. Colaco < jc>" <[email protected]>
Ivo <[email protected]> wrote: "**I do agree with you, Dr.Gilbert. What
Dr.Mark Hyman is writing is true. This is known to any "layman in
medicine" or "quack".....Let us avoid this "scientific illiteracy" on
this Forum.
response:
Interesting discussion between a reputed Oncologist, a brilliant
Neuroscientist and a good Priest. Two among them are definitely not
quacks.
**Precisely, DrJC, as usual, has missed the point. Any "quack" knows about
medical companies today. In fact, there has been no discussion so far
between the two 'experts': a sincere oncologist and the known
neuroscientist. The "reputed Oncologist" did not get the right answer from
the "brilliant Neuroscientist", in this statement the "good Priets" is
correct. Who is "quack"? The one who does not understand it, DrJC...
Talk to the patients and see their reactions. An illiterate may have
sensible statements about medicine or Ayodhya verdict.
It is not only the lawyers or physicians that can talk. As a matter of fact,
in all discussions on the TV there have been objections to the Ayodhya
verdict.
If there had been a discussion with the Judges who gave the verdict, all
these points would come out. That is the reason why the issue is not
considered to be settled, but is going to the Supreme Court. If, according
to JC, only "experts" can give their opinion, this would not happen. What is
being said is to be examined.
As a Catholic priest, I have also the right to speak about all the issues.
Read, investigate, learn, give your opinion if it is already matured... DrJC
usually acts as somebody who dances at the tune of so-called "real
physicians". He will not contribute to the discussion (rarely he does), but
will create sensation. This time let the discussion go on, so that we shall
see whether Dr.Mark Hyman is medically correct or not in the article that
was brought up by Dr.Gilbert.
Regards.
Fr.Ivo
