Unable to refute the data in the original article we are seeing a lot of the usual bobbing and weaving with 'shoot the messenger'. The scientist losses his insights to seek the truth, when it comes to seeing the speck in our own eye.
Another great example of: The "Jack of all subjects" has become the "Master of smear, distortions and bogus comments". So please continue with what you do best. I cannot compete with the master. Regards, GL --------------- Santosh Helekar This is rich. Here is a guy who is telling others not to attack him in a post in which he viciously attacks others, including eminent neurologists, psychiatrists and scientists. Why does Gilbert not follow his own advice and refute specific points in Drs. David Gorski's and Robert Burton's articles with data and references? Why does he abuse physicians, scientists, and the medical profession, instead? ----------------- Gilbert Lawrence: Please do not respond by attacking me; as I am not the topic of this thread.:=)) Neither is the author of the article nor Huffington Post the topic. ... The topic of the thread, for those who care to know, is the need to separate direct financial benefits from the scientist(s) and conclusions of their scientific work. And the same for peer reviewers who are all to often in an "I scratch your back and you scratch mine." "Eminent" neurologists and psychiatrists are the worst offenders (next to those promoting cancer drugs) of promoting expensive and chronic use of new and marginally beneficial drugs; causing marked-rise in cost of healthcare in the USA compared to other countries.
