Mr. Ferdinando here appears to be ignorant about a lot of things, but especially about the self-proclaimed expertise and activities of Gilbert on Goanet. Gilbert has veritably copied and paraphrased a multi-part series here on the European Inquisition. Please see the following links:
http://lists.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet-goanet.org/2010-September/198459.html http://lists.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet-goanet.org/2010-September/199426.html http://lists.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet-goanet.org/2010-September/198524.html http://lists.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet-goanet.org/2010-September/199075.html http://lists.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet-goanet.org/2010-September/198764.html http://lists.goanet.org/pipermail/goanet-goanet.org/2010-October/199765.html Mr. Ferdinando is also misleading Goanetters about me on two fronts: 1. He is not telling them that it was Gilbert who introduced the topic of peer review in this thread while abusing neurologists, psychiatrists and scientists. 2. Under the guise of accusing me of doing something that I have not done he is stealthily insinuating the topic of communalism in this thread on science, which has nothing to do with it. I was merely pointing out Gilbert's hypocrisy of doing something himself that is much worse than he accuses me of doing, posing as a historian on Goanet. It appears now that this shameless trait is shared by Mr. Ferdinando, as well. He is also falsely accusing me of doing the very thing that he is much more guilty of, hilariously in the very same post. Cheers, Santosh --- On Tue, 10/5/10, Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão <[email protected]> wrote: > > RESPONSE : First and > foremost, nowhere in Gilbert’s post has he written > anything > about ‘European Inquisition’. If Santosh does not know > the meaning of the English > word ‘Inquisition’, I would suggest he surf the > dictionaries on the network, > cut and paste it next time. Or is he trying to instigate > communal sentiments > among the netters? It is against Goanet rules to use this > network for your > communal agenda.Secondly, Santosh’s post has deviated > from the main topic of ‘science for sale’ > and is on peer review process which is administrative and > was not the original > topic of discussion. This symptom of flitting ideas of the > mind is not conducive > of a healthy discussion. > > > > > Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão. > > > > >
