On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, FN wrote quoting one line from my posting: By no means the only option nor even the most successful one! You could rake up meaningless communal issues. You could join the corruption bandwaggon. Or the lobby of the brotherhood of khaki shorts swearing to fight dynastic politics while creating another set of dubious heroes.
It's also possible to dance the waltz with the "corrupt" and the "criminals" (whom we recognise as such only when not in alliance with 'em. Or to play on people's feelings of alienation, legitimate protests against malgovernance, and attempt to turn these into a ride-back-to-power chariot. Would you agree? FN My line that is picked up by FN: [is "If you want to be in politics join any notorious gangster group or become a gangster"] My Response: My answered to FN's question: Your response smells as though coming from Kongress clout! Better luck next time!! Best regards, U. G. Barad _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ tambdimati: the Goa review is a community blog of original _/ art, writing, music, news and commentary from and about the _/ smallest state in the subcontinent. check out the newest _/ member of the Goanet family daily at _/ http://www.tambdimati.com. _/ _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
