[1] Fredrick Noronha says: "You could rake up meaningless communal issues. You could join the corruption bandwagon. Or the lobby of the brotherhood of khaki shorts swearing to fight dynastic politics while creating another set of dubious heroes."
[2] U. G. Barad <[email protected]> asks: And between the corruption bandwagon and the khaki shorts, which one does Fredrick choose? FN would you prefer to answer this question by just saying "corruption bandwagon" or "khaki shorts", for there is no need of any justification for your answer. == JC's comment (once again, plagiarised from the comments of Frederick and Aires): Dr. U.G. Barad has done a gotcha on Frederick. Which one do you prefer, Frederick? the Communal ones or the Corrupt ones? I am not sure whether Dr. U.G. Barad is in favour of or in opposition to (directly or by way of result) the communal chaps? BTW1 : It looks as though Dr. U.G. Barad is implying that FN and his ilk might be Kangresswallas just because they advocate an alternate system of government than "communalism"? I'd really ask IF Goa ever had corruption-free government? BTW2: I also believe that it is a "mistaken misconception" to think that the Communal cannot be simultaneously Corrupt. jc _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ _/ _/ tambdimati: the Goa review is a community blog of original _/ art, writing, music, news and commentary from and about the _/ smallest state in the subcontinent. check out the newest _/ member of the Goanet family daily at _/ http://www.tambdimati.com. _/ _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
