---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    **** http://www.GOANET.org ****
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NEW BOOK:  'PATRIOTISM IN ACTION: Goans in Indias Defence Services'
         With Foreword by Gen SF Rodrigues, PVSM, VSM, ADC (retd)
                    former Chief of Indian Army Staff
           and Governor, Punjab & Administrator, Chandigarh UT

Copies now available at:

GOA: Literati (2277740), Other India (2263306), Broadway (6647038),
Mandovi (2427904), Noel DSilva & Associates (9823120454 / 9096781714),
Confidant / Golden Heart Emp (2732450), David & Co (2730326), Vardaan 
(9527463684)
SERV / RETD Def Offrs in Goa: O/o Sainik Co-op Hse Bldg Sty, Def Col, Porvorim 
(2417288)

MUMBAI: David & Co (22019010)

PUNE: Manneys (26131683), Popular (25678327)

BENGALURU: Narayan (22865800)

DELHI: Ritana (24617278)

ONLINE (worldwide delivery): http://www.ritanabooks.com,
http://goa1556.goa-india.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] JC: Is he suggesting that IF all Goans, who have emigrated post
1961, had stayed put in Goa,  then Goa would be a less dirty place? Is
it his  position under that scenario,  these 'bhaille' would not have
come to Goa and would not have filthied up the place.
[2] FN: There would have been less money in Goa, less affluence, and
less dirt*! We could have been more of a sleepy, green 16th century
colonial backwater, then.

[3] JC:  FN must be Churchill's brother.
[4] FN Actually, I am Ricky's brother. FN

[2b] * Mrs G once said that poverty was the biggest polluter; and
never quite explained what she meant, though it made for a good
rhetorical argument. Today, we're actually suffering from affluenza.

JC's comment:

re # [1] and [2] FN has conveniently ducked the question and placed a
subverted answer in situ. Besides, something significant happened
between the 16th century and 1961.

Having noted that, in 2010 (and beyond) moneyed developers are (and
will be) gobbling up under-developed (green) land, concretizing it and
re-selling it at a premium. So Frederick's argument is a flat as a
limboo-sodh which remained out in the open for a whole day.

re # [3] and [4] FN is ducking his actually relationship with Churchill.

wrt # [2b]: All I will say to Mrs. G is "talk is cheap".

jc

Reply via email to