Please note that the author of the post appended below has felt the need to 
launch a defamatory attack against Dr. Stephen Barrett, a well known and well 
respected physician in the international medical community, relying as usual on 
libelous bogus information posted against Dr. Barrett on anti-science and 
anti-medicine websites. 

As yourself - Why does the said author feel so offended by the Quackwatch 
anti-quackery article that I had provided that he feels compelled to abuse a 
person about whom he knows nothing?

Dr. Stephen Barrett is a qualified physician with an M.D. degree from the 
prestigious Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in New York 
City, and a residency in Psychiatry from Temple University Hospital, 
Philadelphia. He has held an active medical license in the State of 
Pennsylvania. He is one of the few people in the world whose profile has 
appeared in Time Magazine for his commendable service to mankind in the fight 
against the scourge of quackery. Here is a link to that article under the title 
"The Man Who Loves To Bust Quacks":

http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,107254,00.html

Cheers,

Santosh

--- On Mon, 4/18/11, Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> 
> Dr Stephen Berrett who operates the Quackwatch.org website
> claims
> to be  M.D in Psychiatry. He has no
> expertise in any other field, People all over the globe
> have made an opinion of him:
> 
> http://ca.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110112130339AAjkcqq
> 
> The Courts in the US have also made an opinion of him:
> 
> http://subversivethinking.blogspot.com/2008/12/skeptic-stephen-barret-of-quackwatchorg.html
> 
> http://www.canlyme.com/quackwatch.html
> 
> Only laymen with little knowledge of science or
> scientifically
> challenged persons will place trust in such non-experts,
> dishonest and pseudo-skeptics opinions and their
> blogs and ignore that Conventional medicine is the third
> leading killer in the US, 250,000 deaths/year; as mentioned
> in the above sites. 
> 
> Dr. Ferdinando dos Reis Falcão.
>

Reply via email to