I would request Admin Noronha to read all my posts in this thread to understand the context of this discussion, and read the following quote from my last post to understand the meaning of even-handedness.
"But if someone wants to read about communal policies of the Portuguese government, and communalism among the Hindus and Catholics during the 451 years of Portuguese rule, and in the early sixties, then here are some references that I have read on this subject:" ......Santosh Helekar Please note the reference to both Hindus and Catholics above, and to communalism in the 1960s. As far as even-handedness in communalism post-1961 is concerned, I would request Admin Noronha to refer me to any scholarly articles that he has written and read on this issue. Cheers, Santosh --- On Tue, 7/5/11, Frederick FN Noronha फ्रेडरिक नोरोन्या *فريدريك نورونيا <[email protected]> wrote: > > This doesn't strike me as a > particularly even-handed tackling of the > situation. By choosing a "suitable" and convenient > time-frame, just > one side of the problem is being highlighted. > > If you search (even just online) for issues of communalism > in Goa > post-1961, the other side of the problem emerges very > clearly and > starkly! Both sides need to be noted, to created a picture > that does > not mislead. FN > > > On 4 July 2011 08:00, Santosh Helekar <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I will let sober and rational people in this forum > decide what kind of communal seeds were sown by whom in > which family, and also who is spreading misinformation here. > But if someone wants to read about communal policies of the > Portuguese government, and communalism among the Hindus and > Catholics during the 451 years of Portuguese rule, and in > the early sixties, then here are some references that I have > read on this subject: >
