It is really cute that FN and BC are having this discussion which includes the safety, pro-fertility and contra 'high dhobi bills' pros or cons of the lungi.
There was a time, not too long ago, when FN doubted the very existence of BC except as a pseudonym. Some even believed, I dare say, that BC was actually JC. Finally, the mystery (to FN) appears to have been solved after a visit to Macau by a Moidecar from Portugal. At least that 'mystery' was solved. Dhobi bills hanh? ....eeww! jc Pardon any Typos. This IPad does some curious auto- corrections On Aug 26, 2012, at 9:21 PM, Bernado Colaco <[email protected]> wrote: > Xri FN, at least accept Chinese Communism and surivive. The lungi is not > only unsafe but also unhealthy. If you see the video carefully one chappeis > toga disloged after the fire and underneath there was a Raju chaddi.The best > option for the male specie to carry on is to go about like Prince Harry. It > is believed that in the future man will be mammaring the kidos, babies will > born outside the womb and there will be no need of us men. > > BC > > > > Dear BC: > > Just as you have (rightly) accepted contemporary Chinese Communism > (actually, an unabashed form of post-industrial capitalism) as a > superior evolved mode of production, grant us too mere mortals the > right to change saratorially. > > Without doubt, the lungi is a superior garb. Both in terms of > economics, aesthetics, lack of (needless) design, and on health > grounds too (in a context where the declining fertility rates are > alarming). Not without reason has it travelled far and wide, unlike > say our own humble six-letter word (kashti). We were gifted nice, > Tamil-made lungis in Penang a year or two ago. > > The only debate really on now is whether we should prefer white or > coloured. My preference is the latter, as it saves on dhobi bills too. >
