http://www.thestar.com/opinion/editorial_cartoon/2013/08/12/editorial_cartoon_august_12.html

(For general info: Saskatchewan is landlocked in the centre of Canada)

----------------------------------------
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Goa Beaches - Quo Vadis?
> Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2013 21:52:30 -0400
>
> The Editor
> Navhind Papers and Publications,
> Navhind Bhavan,
> Panaji,
> Goa 403001
>
> Dear Sir:
>
> Goa Beaches - Quo Vadis?
>
> I have read in your paper, with dismay, about the illegal sand extraction in 
> Amona.
> I have written many times about this subject and have personally lobbied 
> Chief Minister M Parrikar (during his previous term) on this subject.
> I have witnessed beach sand extraction continuing unabated for many years.
>
> We have all been cautioned by the National Institute of Oceanography, Goa, 
> which monitors sea-level rise.
> They estimate a mean sea level rise from tide gauge data at selected stations 
> along the coast of a rise of less than 1 mm/year. (Current Science, February 
> 10, 2006)
> i.e. according to NIO the sea should have risen 0.7cm by this year. But 
> Kerala has already experienced 1 cm rise. So sea levels are rising faster 
> than forecast.
> The devastation on Kerala's coastline is being duplicated in Goa.
>
> Severe weather patterns of the type of hurricanes Katrina and Sandy and 
> recent devastating flooding in Uttarakhand are now considered to be not 
> unusual. You just have to ask citizens of New Jersey how scary it was to see 
> huge volumes of sea water rush inland and engulf their cities.
> Most climate change models had forecast a global sea-level rise of half a 
> meter (over 1½ feet) by 2100. (i.e. 50 cm).
> Now new projections show that by 2050, if not sooner, the world's oceans will 
> rise about a meter, and this will be just enough to inundate the Maldives, 
> parts of Bangladesh, other Pacific islands and many low coastal areas in the 
> U.S., Asia and other nations.
>
> Currently a number of islands in the South Pacific are already not longer 
> habitable due to sea water entering their aquifers. People are moving to 
> larger islands.
>
> You do not have to be a genius to realize that 50 to 100 times the rise in 
> sea lea levels will make our beaches disappear sooner than we think - perhaps 
> within the next 15 to 30 years the beaches that have attracted tourists to 
> Goa will not be there.
> We will be left with sea, rocks and an embankment of tetra pods which will 
> only serve to protect the illegal structures built in the CRZ.
>
> To exacerbate the bad situation we have people (aided and abetted by local 
> politicians, no doubt) pilfering our sand.
> Those with computers can see the NDTV expose done in 2011 where incredulously 
> our (previous) Minister of the Environment talks about legalizing sand 
> extraction for construction. Sigh!
> (see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X8USUCcjObo and 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ld-l6tf1pcI)
>
> Consider the case of Florida which relies heavily on tourism (like Goa).
> The Floridians consider that beach erosion threatens the very resource that 
> residents and visitors enjoy.
> What are they doing about it?
> They are restoring eroded beaches through beach nourishment. In a typical 
> beach nourishment project, sand (hundreds of tons) is collected from an 
> offshore location by a dredge and is piped onto the beach. because it 
> provides a significant level of storm protection benefits for upland 
> properties and is the least impacting to the coastal system. An additional 
> benefit of beach restoration projects is that they quickly restore shorebird 
> and marine turtle habitat.
>
>
> And we think that allowing just the opposite to happen is OK?
>
>
> Tim de Mello
> Canada                                          

Reply via email to