On Nov 22, 2013, at 10:15 PM, Mervyn Lobo wrote thus to 007 Jim 'You feel you have the right to use any word, any where. That is probably because of the way you were brought up. However, my concern is not with you. My concern is with the moderators'
Response: Dear Mervyn, While I do not blame children for the actions of their parents, and parents for the actions of their adult children, I'd submit the following: 1: Jim has every right to 'shaft' and otherwise 'cuss' me out. 2: As I do not control the 'Rights and Responsibility' section of Goanet, I will not comment on that 'right' wrt Goanet. 3: On the point that Goanet moderators follow intriguingly disparate standards of moderation, I support the Moderators. 4: I have long accepted that the Moderators are always right. 5: Besides, if I do not like their moderation, I should not be here. The crucial point, as far as I am concerned wrt the Jet Airways Customer Service in this index case, is the following: Was the Jet Airways Customer Service agent and/or Jet Airways wrong in the assignment of Domestic Charges to Jim's luggage ? BTW: jc has NO 'beef' with 007 Jim. He (jc) might have a question about the Child Preventive Care charges "gripe" on that 'beef' subject. In a curious way, that is "related" to the 007 complaint about Jet Airways. Am Copying this to you as I do not know IF the Moderators will reject this msg. jc
