"Jonas Karlsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This is not true. From the DLJ FAQ > (http://download.java.net/dlj/DLJ-FAQ-v1.1.txt):
The DLJ FAQ seems to contradict the licence in other places, such as the need to indemnify Sun for a wide range of things. Why not wait for Sun to figure out WTF they really mean and present a consistent and understandable licence and FAQ? This whole Java release looks like another lawyerbomb. Distributions use it, then bang! "You're my wife now." (see http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/guide/articles/l/leagueofgentleme_66602120.shtml if you don't get the reference and can play such video files) > [...] and allow the user to review them before download. So how does one do that if not clickthrough? > [...] This means, of course, that the package > maintainer have to rename the license file. Or symlink it. -- MJ Ray - personal email, see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ irc.oftc.net/slef Jabber/SIP ask _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
