"sk_Option "%s %s %s %s or skip this dependency"
I think that the problem is the "or" This isn't enough? "sk_Option "%s %s %s %s" On 7/24/06, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
André Detsch wrote: > On 7/24/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How do we handle blacklists here? It's now asking for Glibc, even >> though it's blacklisted at Dependencies.blacklist. > > Oh, blacklist was'nt integrated yet. Btw, seems to be easy. I'll do it > today. > > >> The questions become a little strange with this modification: >> CheckDependencies: Compile Glibc 2.4 recipe or skip this dependency? >> [Y]es/[N]o/[NA]No to All/[YA]Yes to All > > Hmm... Any suggestion? :) [Y]es / [N]o / N[o]ne / [A]ll Or maybe y/n/o/a/? and typing ? will bring up: [Y]es / [N]o / N[o] to all / Yes to [A]ll -- /Jonatan - http://kymatica.com _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
-- fabio.m "Nem tudo que é bonito cheira bem." _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel