"sk_Option "%s %s %s %s or skip this dependency"

I think that the problem is the "or"

This isn't enough?
"sk_Option "%s %s %s %s"

On 7/24/06, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
André Detsch wrote:
> On 7/24/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> How do we handle blacklists here? It's now asking for Glibc, even
>> though it's blacklisted at Dependencies.blacklist.
>
> Oh, blacklist was'nt integrated yet. Btw, seems to be easy. I'll do it
> today.
>
>
>> The questions become a little strange with this modification:
>> CheckDependencies: Compile Glibc 2.4 recipe or skip this dependency?
>> [Y]es/[N]o/[NA]No to All/[YA]Yes to All
>
> Hmm... Any suggestion? :)

[Y]es / [N]o / N[o]ne / [A]ll

Or maybe y/n/o/a/? and typing ? will bring up:

[Y]es / [N]o / N[o] to all / Yes to [A]ll

--
/Jonatan - http://kymatica.com
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel



--
fabio.m
"Nem tudo que é bonito cheira bem."
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel

Reply via email to