Lucas C. Villa Real wrote: > On 7/24/06, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 7/24/06, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > The questions become a little strange with this modification: >> > CheckDependencies: Compile Glibc 2.4 recipe or skip this dependency? >> > [Y]es/[N]o/[NA]No to All/[YA]Yes to All >> >> You mean the grammar? I didn't see a problem, but maybe >> "Compile recipe for Glibc 2.4 or skip this dependency?" >> looks better. > > I would expect a direct answer to the questions, such as: > "Compile recipe for Glibc 2.4 or skip this dependency? [C]ompile/ > [S]kip/ [CA] Compile to All/ [SA] Skip to All" > > Does it look fine for you?
Maybe skip the 'to's? [C] Compile / [S] Skip / [CA] Compile All / [SA] Skip All" -- /Jonatan - http://kymatica.com _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
