On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:34:22 +0200, Lucas C. Villa Real
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/10/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the discussion about Unmanaged files, we touched the subject of
fibosandbox vs unionsandbox. This gave me an idea for two new options in
recipes: fibosandbox_options and unionsandbox_options
fibosandbox_options=(
"--add-alloved=${goboModules}/Current/misc"
}
unionsandbox_options=(
"unmanaged_files=(${goboModules}/Current/misc)"
)
To be able to distribute one recipe to people that doesn't have (or do
have) unionsandbox. What do you think?
Personally I don't like the distinction about unionsandbox and
fibosandbox inside recipes. It would be a lot better to just specify a
"sandbox_options" array, and then translate each option to the backend
used by the user.
When I think about it, I don't like it either. But I do think there has to
be something to take care of the transition between fibosandbox and
unionsandbox. Perhaps the --add-allowed option for fibosandbox is handled
as an unmanaged directory in unionsandbox?
--
/Jonas
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
