On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 04:51:06 +0200, Lucas C. Villa Real
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/10/06, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 23:34:22 +0200, Lucas C. Villa Real
>> fibosandbox_options=(
>> "--add-alloved=${goboModules}/Current/misc"
>> }
>>
>> unionsandbox_options=(
>> "unmanaged_files=(${goboModules}/Current/misc)"
>> )
>
When I think about it, I don't like it either. But I do think there has
to
be something to take care of the transition between fibosandbox and
unionsandbox. Perhaps the --add-allowed option for fibosandbox is
handled
as an unmanaged directory in unionsandbox?
Looking better on the subject, isn't it better to just let fibosandbox
deal with unmanaged_files instead? That way we don't need to enlarge
the Compile API, while keeping the syntax simple. Something like
(needs to make proper handling of arrays):
if [ "$unionsandbox" ]
then # keep using $unmanaged_files like it's doing now
else sandbox_options="--add-allowed=$unmanaged_files"
fi
You can already use "--add-allowed" as an option to the sandbox_options
array, so using that isn't an enlargement of the API. But maybe we should
allow both ways around, as there already are recipes with --add-allowed,
but labelling the sandbox_options deprecated?
--
/Jonas
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
