Andy Feldman wrote: > As Lucas said, the rule might have a syntax error. I found the syntax > has changed since the first time I used Udev on Gobo, so even copying > a rule that used to work is not guaranteed. Try running udevtest on > /dev/fuse: it should try to parse all the rules in /S/S/udev/rules.d/ > and warn you about any bad ones. > > -Andy > > On 2/18/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 2/18/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Jonatan Liljedahl wrote: >>> /etc/udev/rules.d/40-fuse.rules:KERNEL="fuse", NAME="%k", MODE="0666" >>> >>> any ideas? >> The rule seems to be fine, except for the fact that all lines starting >> with KERNEL on my udev rules here uses "==" instead of a single "=": >> KERNEL=="ht*", NAME="%k", GROUP="tape" >> >> Does that change anything?
I just found this too, and was about to post you about it! I found a few KERNEL="..." in 50-udev.rules too! There should be no *assignments* to the KERNEL variable, it's just for checking... Also: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]udevtest /dev/fuse add_to_rules: invalid SYSFS operation add_to_rules: invalid rule '/System/Settings/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules:261' add_to_rules: invalid SYSFS operation add_to_rules: invalid rule '/System/Settings/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules:262' So, the Udev recipe and package should be updated with corrected rule files. And the same for FUSE! Will someone do this? -- /Jonatan -=( http://kymatica.com )=- _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
