Jonatan Liljedahl wrote: > Andy Feldman wrote: >> As Lucas said, the rule might have a syntax error. I found the syntax >> has changed since the first time I used Udev on Gobo, so even copying >> a rule that used to work is not guaranteed. Try running udevtest on >> /dev/fuse: it should try to parse all the rules in /S/S/udev/rules.d/ >> and warn you about any bad ones. >> >> -Andy >> >> On 2/18/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On 2/18/07, Jonatan Liljedahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Jonatan Liljedahl wrote: >>>> /etc/udev/rules.d/40-fuse.rules:KERNEL="fuse", NAME="%k", MODE="0666" >>>> >>>> any ideas? >>> The rule seems to be fine, except for the fact that all lines starting >>> with KERNEL on my udev rules here uses "==" instead of a single "=": >>> KERNEL=="ht*", NAME="%k", GROUP="tape" >>> >>> Does that change anything? > > I just found this too, and was about to post you about it! > I found a few KERNEL="..." in 50-udev.rules too! There should be no > *assignments* to the KERNEL variable, it's just for checking... > > Also: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]udevtest /dev/fuse > add_to_rules: invalid SYSFS operation > add_to_rules: invalid rule '/System/Settings/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules:261' > add_to_rules: invalid SYSFS operation > add_to_rules: invalid rule '/System/Settings/udev/rules.d/50-udev.rules:262' > > So, the Udev recipe and package should be updated with corrected rule > files. And the same for FUSE! Will someone do this?
And BTW, don't forget this fix in /etc/udev/udev.conf: udev_rules="/System/Settings/udev/rules.d" -- /Jonatan -=( http://kymatica.com )=- _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
