I got the same console and /Kernel/Device errors reported ... Also, I booted through Colinux and things looked OK...however...
When I booted directly, it failed with the following USB errors ( I had been running Gobo perfectly off the USB disk so far )...it kept looping back to the USB full speed device detected prompt...and then USB disconnect...something about configuration #1 chosen... something in these rules breaks something in USB...but I can't pin point what.... Sep 4 23:50:58 (none) kernel: [ 17.555000] udev: renamed network interface eth0 to eth1 Sep 4 23:50:58 (none) kernel: [ 17.622000] eth0: Tigon3 [partno(BCM95751M) rev 4101 PHY(5750)] (PCI Express) 10/100/1000Base-T Et hernet 00:14:c2:e2:b0:18 Sep 4 23:50:58 (none) kernel: [ 17.622000] eth0: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] ASF[0] WireSpeed[1] TSOcap[1] Sep 4 23:50:58 (none) kernel: [ 17.622000] eth0: dma_rwctrl[76180000] dma_mask[64-bit] Sep 4 23:51:10 (none) kernel: [ 32.137000] usb 5-1: USB disconnect, address 3 Sep 4 23:51:10 (none) udevd-event[2195]: delete_path: rmdir(/System/Kernel/Devices) failed: Device or resource busy Sep 4 23:51:10 (none) udevd-event[2196]: delete_path: rmdir(/System/Kernel/Devices) failed: Device or resource busy Sep 4 23:51:10 (none) udevd-event[2198]: delete_path: rmdir(/System/Kernel/Devices) failed: Device or resource busy Sep 4 23:51:18 (none) kernel: [ 40.137000] usb 5-1: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 5 Sep 4 23:51:18 (none) kernel: [ 40.338000] usb 5-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice Sep 4 23:51:48 (none) kernel: [ 70.115000] usb 5-1: USB disconnect, address 5 Sep 4 23:51:48 (none) udevd-event[2231]: delete_path: rmdir(/System/Kernel/Devices) failed: Device or resource busy Sep 4 23:51:48 (none) udevd-event[2232]: delete_path: rmdir(/System/Kernel/Devices) failed: Device or resource busy Sep 4 23:51:48 (none) udevd-event[2234]: delete_path: rmdir(/System/Kernel/Devices) failed: Device or resource busy Sep 4 23:52:37 (none) kernel: [ 119.628000] usb 5-1: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 6 Sep 4 23:52:37 (none) kernel: [ 119.829000] usb 5-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice Sep 4 23:53:08 (none) kernel: [ 150.097000] usb 5-1: USB disconnect, address 6 Sep 4 23:53:08 (none) udevd-event[2267]: delete_path: rmdir(/System/Kernel/Devices) failed: Device or resource busy Sep 4 23:53:08 (none) udevd-event[2268]: delete_path: rmdir(/System/Kernel/Devices) failed: Device or resource busy Sep 4 23:53:08 (none) udevd-event[2270]: delete_path: rmdir(/System/Kernel/Devices) failed: Device or resource busy Sep 4 23:53:48 (none) kernel: [ 190.896000] usb 5-1: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 7 Sep 4 23:53:49 (none) kernel: [ 191.096000] usb 5-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice Sep 4 23:54:19 (none) kernel: [ 221.193000] usb 5-1: USB disconnect, address 7 Sep 4 23:54:19 (none) udevd-event[2303]: delete_path: rmdir(/System/Kernel/Devices) failed: Device or resource busy Sep 4 23:54:19 (none) udevd-event[2304]: delete_path: rmdir(/System/Kernel/Devices) failed: Device or resource busy Sep 4 23:54:19 (none) udevd-event[2306]: delete_path: rmdir(/System/Kernel/Devices) failed: Device or resource bus ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hisham Muhammad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Development of the GoboLinux distribution" <gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 12:21:20 -0300 Subject: Re: [gobolinux-devel] [gobolinux-users] Udev errors > On 9/4/07, Isaac Dupree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hisham Muhammad wrote: > > > On 9/3/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I'm fighting with Udev as well. I'm working on a recipe for version > > >> 115. I'll post it here before committing. Could you test it? > > >> > > >> Thanks in advance, > > > > > > And here is the Udev recipe I'm currently working with: > > > > > > http://hisham.gobolinux.org/Udev--115--recipe.tar.bz2 > > > > My system runs with that recipe (all "use new" Settings), but complains > > in log-messages about no "console" group because my system is 013-based. > > (should recipes depend on group selection policies? do they have a > choice?) > > Thanks for the report. > > I'm going to post a revised version using various groups instead of > "console", because while debugging the ISO I soon realized that the > "console" group simplification is a big maintenance headache. Really > not worth it. I'll revert the changes made to use "console" (it's > going to be a pain to scan through everything to make sure I don't > miss anything). > > -- Hisham > _______________________________________________ > gobolinux-devel mailing list > gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org > http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel > _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
