On 9/12/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/12/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/12/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I thought that it would be nice to have an option to suppress output, so I
> > > created two new options: '--quiet/-q' and '--very-quiet/-Q'. I would have
> > > commited this directly unless there were collisions with the use of the
> > > '-q' option, namingly that SystemFind and UpdateSettings use it as short
> > > option of '--quick'. My proposal is to change that to '-k' instead.
> > > Therefore I've attached the patch for review and test so that nothing
> > > breaks.
> >
> > I just don't see the point in having -q / -Q. IMO only one level of
> > quiet is necessary ("completely quiet"), as we already have normal and
> > verbose.
>
> Completely quiet is >/dev/null.Still, only one quiet level makes sense to me.. -- Lucas powered by /dev/dsp _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
