2007/9/13, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 9/12/07, Hisham Muhammad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 9/12/07, Lucas C. Villa Real <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 9/12/07, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I thought that it would be nice to have an option to suppress output,
> > > > so I
> > > > created two new options: '--quiet/-q' and '--very-quiet/-Q'. I would
> > > > have
> > > > commited this directly unless there were collisions with the use of the
> > > > '-q' option, namingly that SystemFind and UpdateSettings use it as short
> > > > option of '--quick'. My proposal is to change that to '-k' instead.
> > > > Therefore I've attached the patch for review and test so that nothing
> > > > breaks.
> > >
> > > I just don't see the point in having -q / -Q. IMO only one level of
> > > quiet is necessary ("completely quiet"), as we already have normal and
> > > verbose.
> >
> > Completely quiet is >/dev/null.
>
> Still, only one quiet level makes sense to me..
>
I thought that it would be good to have one level that suppressed
normal output, but showed terse/warnings, and one level that
suppressed everything but errors.
--
/Jonas
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
