On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:42:53 +0200, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> To my knowledge, we have acks from me, Jonas, Lucas, Hisham, André, >> and Carlo, which covers most of the code, but we still need them from >> Dan, Guillherme, Rafael, MJ, and Aitor. Also from anybody who's >> contributed a copyrightable patch. If we can get that I will go >> through and put proper license headers on the files. > > Just a quick ACK for the archives. BTW everyone should ACK to the > list for posterity. The ACKs are to clarify the "handwavy GPL" we've > had. In a sense it is relicensing. > ACK by request. > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:06 AM, Jorgen Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> The GPL requires you to keep software Free (not as in "no cost", >> but "freedom") if you modify it. In the philosophical paradoxon, >> it chooses the option that you can _not_ remove the freedom of >> someone (something) else. The BSD licenses choose the option that >> you _can_ remove the freedom. Arguing which one is "more free" is >> missing the basic problem. >> > > Very well said. > You're both wrong ;) -- /Jonas Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel