On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 6:52 AM, Michael Homer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > There was some discussion on the tools licensing situation on IRC in > the last couple of days, ultimately settling on GPL 2+ for the moment. > Much of what's in the repository now has vague handwavy "GPL" > licensing or none at all. Is everybody ok with that license? (pro tem > at least) > > To my knowledge, we have acks from me, Jonas, Lucas, Hisham, André, > and Carlo, which covers most of the code, but we still need them from > Dan, Guillherme, Rafael, MJ, and Aitor. Also from anybody who's > contributed a copyrightable patch. If we can get that I will go > through and put proper license headers on the files. > > The idea of setting up a formal organisation, and possibly doing > copyright assignment to that, was also raised, but I think shelved for > the moment. It would be good to get an idea of how people would feel > about that as well.
Yes, I'm ok with GPL2/GPL2+. -- Lucas powered by /dev/dsp _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
