On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Jonas Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree that the cost for versioned binaries are much less then the > benefit that comes from it. >
agreed. > What I do think may cause an issue is signing of programs/packages. As > versioned binaries should be a user option packages should not contain > them but they should be created by SymlinkProgram. This causes the > FileHash to be out of sync, forcing the user to resign the program if > he/she should be able to verify it later. Of course this is no problem > if versioned binaries are adopted throughout. > Why can't SymlinkProgram create version'ed symlinks in /S/L/E directly? That would avoid all signing/packaging issues and keep /Programs/Foo/1.0/bin less cluttered (not a huge issue). -- Carlo J. Calica _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel
