On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just want to > avoid adding odd Goboisms if other options exist.
I think that's a wise principle (even though I failed to follow it in the past). On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Benjamin Bruheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, wouldn't the non-Current executables possibly fail if the > executable uses the legacy tree? Yes. And not only the legacy tree, but some of its libraries may have their symlinks overwritten under /S/L/L, etc (e.g. it's quite likely that /bin/konqueror-3 and /bin/konqueror-4 wouldn't work at the same time). That's an important point to keep in mind. That's good motivation to add versioned executables only in specific, needed, known-to-work cases. -- Hisham _______________________________________________ gobolinux-devel mailing list gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel