On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Carlo Calica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just want to
> avoid adding odd Goboisms if other options exist.

I think that's a wise principle (even though I failed to follow it in the past).

On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Benjamin Bruheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, wouldn't the non-Current executables possibly fail if the
> executable uses the legacy tree?

Yes. And not only the legacy tree, but some of its libraries may have
their symlinks overwritten under /S/L/L, etc (e.g. it's quite likely
that /bin/konqueror-3 and /bin/konqueror-4 wouldn't work at the same
time). That's an important point to keep in mind. That's good
motivation to add versioned executables only in specific, needed,
known-to-work cases.

-- Hisham
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-devel mailing list
gobolinux-devel@lists.gobolinux.org
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-devel

Reply via email to