On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Vincent <[email protected]> wrote:

> > *Problem #1: I forced to do it, since Gobo doesn’t allow “simplified
> > allocation” of drive. Nowadays there is no any serious reason to split
> one
> > drive for /boot, /home and other partitions.*
>
> L> We're not going to cover all possible partition allocation scenarios in
> our
> L> installer.
>
> Actually it's the most common case - use a whole drive. Only old-school
> beards
> use separate partitions, because they have complex use scenario on
> corporate servers.
> I think it's not a big job put one more option [x] Use full drive - this
> will
> simplify entrance for beginners (if you wish Gobo be more popular).
>
> *Problem #2: On “select packages” stage ALL PACKAGES WERE SELECTED!
>
> L> Been there, done that. We may do that on the next release again.
>
> Yep, cool! Funny to say, but some people even don't need GCC!
> Having minimal preselected set won't create any problem, since we have
> dependency resolution.
>
> > *Problem #3: Only a few packages had description. WHY??
>
> L> We had a call for alpha/beta testing and, despite the great feedback we
> L> received, nobody noticed that, and I didn't spot that either.
>
> Emm... I cannot detect, is it eyes problem or something mental, but
> believe me -
> sitting in front of hundred abbreviations is not the option even for
> professional penguinners.
> I saw _a_few_ descriptions, but most of 'em were missing. Do you confirm
> THEY WERE MISSING?
> Hardly only my PC lost the text! :)
>

Yes, I confirm they are missing. I've opened an issue to make sure I fix
that in the next release cycle.


>
> > *Problem #4:** Autoinstall of packages went well only for first 30
> > packages, next I got… NO SPACE ERROR!
>
> L> Are you sure you have formatted your target partition?
>
> Ah... thanks, one more puzzle (after fdisk) before I get normal
> installation! :)
> You can hate Windowoze, but it's exemplary system for user friendly setup.
> My offer is to eliminate this headache with partitions/formatting - in
> 21th century
> it's shame to behave like geeks from 70-ies - format that, solder that,
> switch this... it's boring/stupid/ridiculous!
> Installer should offer default, non-intrusive behaviour: automate as much
> as possible,
> give option where it's necessary. Next->next->next - viola, your system is
> ready!
>
> L> ... Or, perhaps, you installed it on the ESP (bootloader) partition.
>
> No-no... don't mix responsibility - not me, but Installer! My job was just
> answer
> dialogs.
>

Yes, and one of the dialogs was asking if you wanted to format the target
partition. I wonder if that box was left unchecked?


> *So please let’s fix these childish problems and reissue new, more adequate
> > release.*
>
> L> I like it whey you say "let's". I will happily review pull requests.
>
> I'm developer and happy to help, but my primary language is C# on Win.
> In background I have Perl, C, Tcl, Ruby, Delphi... hell, I can study even
> Lua!
> Just guess how I was disappointed to see Installer was written on clownish
> 'python'.
> Fortran-like "space depended syntax" - I thought it's dead in 70-es, but
> no... there is always
> marginal people who drive across road. :)
> Well, I can look at the code, but I cannot guarantee my fixes won't make
> you falling in LOL :)
>
> This code: https://github.com/gobolinux/Installer/blob/master/bin/
> GoboLinuxInstaller
> is the only code used for setup?
>

Yes, that's Installer's main code. Some of the utilities it invokes come
from the ConfigTools package, available here:
https://github.com/gobolinux/ConfigTools/tree/master/bin

But for the points you raised on your emails, GoboLinuxInstaller is the
script you'll want to play with.

Lucas
_______________________________________________
gobolinux-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gobolinux.org/mailman/listinfo/gobolinux-users

Reply via email to