On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 5:25 PM, Liam <networkimp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 5:13:36 PM UTC-7, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Liam <networ...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Sunday, October 16, 2016 at 2:56:42 PM UTC-7, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> >> To argue that this should go into the standard library, look at some
>> >> corpus of Go code and find out how often it occurs. If it occurs
>> >> fairly often, you've got a good case.
>> > Fairly often; i.e. as often as Replace or Trim*? In my experience it
>> > passes
>> > that test.
>> This is something that can actually be measured.
> By doing grep 'append.*append' ? And '\[:.*len\(.*\).*\+[0-9]+.*\]' ?
> Neither of these will be accurate.
> Part of my point is that Insert operations are semantically obscured.
Understood. But my guess is that insertion operations are fairly
rare--much less common than Replace or Trim. People obviously append
to slices all the time, but I suspect that they tend to write their
slice operations to not require inserting a single element in the
middle of the slice, because insertion is by definition O(N) rather
than O(1). I could certainly be wrong, but that guess leads me to
suspect that adding a function for something that can easily be
written in a single expression is overkill. Since I am only guessing,
and since it seems to me that you are also guessing, I think we should
measure rather than guess.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.