On Tuesday, 13 December 2016 20:06:49 UTC-5, Dave Cheney wrote: > > I advice caution, Go is not Java and does not permit circular > dependencies. The more packages you have, the greater the chance you have > of creating a circular dependency. >
That's a rather dark viewpoint. Absent further information, there's nothing wrong with breaking up a large package into smaller ones, nor with using tools to help do so. Even packages with circular dependencies can be separated by using function or interface parameters to express the interdependence. Of course it can be overused, but so can any technique. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
