Hi Caleb.
Thanks! I see both the limitation and the exception.
Other than implementation complexity, is there a reason for the limitation of
single-valued expressions? Is there some fundamental problem with allowing
multi-valued expressions that I'm missing?
John
John Souvestre - New Orleans LA
-----Original Message-----
From: Caleb Spare [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 2017 January 25, Wed 18:46
To: John Souvestre
Cc: golang-nuts
Subject: Re: [go-nuts] Is Go too strict for nesting function callings?
https://golang.org/ref/spec#Calls
Look for "As a special case, if the return values of a function or
method g are equal in number"
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 4:42 PM, John Souvestre <[email protected]> wrote:
> Then I'm still confused. Where is this inconsistency / limitation /
> non-orthogonal "syntactic sugar" defined? I'm trying to understand why it
> exists if perhaps it isn't necessary.
>
> John
>
> John Souvestre - New Orleans LA
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Dave Cheney
> Sent: 2017 January 25, Wed 18:30
> To: golang-nuts
> Subject: RE: [go-nuts] Is Go too strict for nesting function callings?
>
> It was just a turn of phrase, it's not a real rule.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
