On Monday, 5 June 2017 12:30:33 UTC+3, mhh...@gmail.com wrote: > > just to add, > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHCtEjzZ-rY > > I could not agree more on the end, > i could argue about some arguments ;) > > btw, is there a channel that gathers all talks about go ? >
https://gophervids.appspot.com/ and for slides https://talks.golang.org/ > https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCO3LEtymiLrgvpb59cNsb8A > https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSRhwaM00ay0fasnsw6EXKA > https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_BzFbxG2za3bp5NRRRXJSw > https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCx9QVEApa5BKLw9r8cnOFEA > https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCz7KItbg3owOqMpB5IjI7sA ? > https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWbNJn6vUW5SMRdqtoOHK5g > > On Monday, June 5, 2017 at 11:00:45 AM UTC+2, mhh...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> as anyway the thread has completely derived, >> its the right place to put about that. >> >> I recently read about stanford choosing to use JS over Java >> for some its courses. >> >> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/04/24/stanford_tests_javascript_in_place_of_java/ >> >> I can t understand. >> If a beginner ask me which language he should learn, >> i d say go, >> i d say him, stay put, its unfortunately not easy to enter, but its gonna >> be a great learning place. >> >> I was an heavy user of javascript, >> i loved it for its stream api, >> i hated it because of its stream api. >> >> I say its not a good language for beginners, >> its apparent ease hides a much greater complexity, >> and it does not teach the traditional programming science, >> but it has those good things like >> its a local problem solver rather than a define all the world approach. >> >> Anyway, my point is to say that i see in this decision of the stanford >> university >> the proof that something has to happen. >> >> THey were teaching Java before, how it come they chosen JS over go ? >> >> On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 9:52:27 AM UTC+2, mhh...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> see the title, only for what s needed >>> Slice/Splice/Each/Map/First/Last/Reverse/Sort ect ect not len, for reason. >>> so interface system serves the userland by its definition of struct, and >>> the basic slice type provided by the language is fully operational, without >>> breaking, btw. i don t go further in evaluation, i leave that to the >>> reader, just trying to work decently. >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
