Hi Dorival,
thanks for supporting me with my idea.
And yes, after writing my post yesterday I was thinking, "watchif" or even
simply "watch".
And yes, today I am more in favor of simply *"watch"*.
And yes, we can constrain this to the context of one function (like defer),
I am ok with that.
What you are describing how you work with errors and how you spent hours
adding
*if err != nil*
that is *exactly* my point.
On could nicely write this
...
watch err!=nil {
handle_sql_error(err)
}
...
Of course, watch could also be used to not watch out for errors but any
other places where new values to get assigned to variables.
Martin
>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
