On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:49 AM, derek <denc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 7:39 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <i...@golang.org> wrote:
>>> Like for Nodejs, and Python and many other language has permanent
>>> archived docs for olders versions:
>>>
>>> https://nodejs.org/docs/v8.4.0/api/http2.html   is permanent URL for
>>> nodejs v8.4.0
>>>
>>> https://nodejs.org/api/http2.html    is always pointing to latest version
>>
>> We don't have that.  You can build it yourself easily enough: clone
>> the git repo, check out 1.6 and run godoc with the -goroot option
>> pointing at that directory.
>
> I know how to set up a godoc site locally, but the problem then is not
> Google searchable...         harder to share via a single link about a
> historic library function design...
> So I prefer if anyone knows a 3rd party godoc service online for a
> longer period?
>
> And question to the ones behind the official golang.org/doc/..  , Is
> there a reason intentionally not doing so?  for the archived docs for
> older versions?
> It's unbelievable not providing any information online about historic
> versions, all because relatively young age?
>
> I know the Go designer's goal for 1.x at least is to be backward
> compatible for all historic versions down to 1.0?
> So when every newer 1.x version release, it's kind of calling everyone
> to upgrade,
> But if suppose there's a Go 1.x version market share research, I don't
> believe the current latest 1.9 has taken all 100% of share?  The Go1.8
> may still have 20% and Go1.6 10% ?
>
> I don't have the exact numbers, but The archived docs for an older
> version still must have some value;
>
> In the longer future, when Go 2 released,   it can't take 100% market
> share at day1, right?  it might take some years to convince every Go
> user to upgrade, Would you have an archived godoc for the last 1.x ?

Perhaps.  It's certainly worth considering.

Maintaining online docs for older Go versions sounds like a fine idea
to me.  It also sounds like work that somebody has to do.


> To any 3rd party Go related site owners,  would you like to setup such
> archives service?

Sounds like a good approach.  Or I'm also open to someone writing the
necessary code for golang.org.

Ian

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to