Then the main question would be why is it possible to embed type aliases? On Sunday, January 21, 2018 at 10:42:28 PM UTC+3:30, Kevin Malachowski wrote: > > Given the last playground post, I'd guess that the aliased type (i.e. > 'int' here) is being used for visibility rather than the alias's new name. > > It's also a little weird to use embedded types that dont need to be > (there's no method promotion here because 'int' has no methods), or seeing > aliases to primitive types. Do you need to do both of those things? >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
