The main issue tracking vendoring-related discussion is https://github.com/golang/go/issues/27227 On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 at 09:08, <gary.willoug...@victoriaplumb.com> wrote: > > Vendor must be kept for when dependencies are no longer available online. > > On Saturday, 17 November 2018 04:33:55 UTC, Henry wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> It seems to me that go modules and vendor attempt to solve the same problem. >> I wonder whether we should just choose one and scrap the other, or find a >> way to consolidate them under a single unified feature. I am a bit concerned >> with the direction Go is going. People keep adding stuffs into Go and later >> find themselves unable to remove existing features due to the backward >> compatibility promise. Go 1.11 is a different beast than Go 1.0, and is >> significantly more complex. >> >> I think Go2 is an opportunity to learn from Go1, and to start from a clean >> slate by scraping and consolidating features. Go2 needs to be simpler than >> Go1.11 >> >> Henry > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
