On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 06:06:22AM -0600, Robert Engels wrote:
I think that is a bit unclear - even if they access different elements, if they 
ever access the same element even at different times , you need 
synchronization- it’s not only if the access the same element “concurrently”.

No, that seems wrong. If, for any two distinct accesses A and B, either A happens before B or B happens before A (i.e. there is no concurrent access), what would you need additional synchronization for? Access is already serialized.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to