In the specific case you cite, it seems doubtful to me that you couldn’t properly test a 60 line method fully externally/black box
> On Mar 2, 2020, at 3:32 PM, Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > That’s where people management. Seasoned vets are better off devoting energy > to changing things than fighting fires - much better in the long run imo. > >>> On Mar 2, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Warren Stephens <wsteph...@prognoshealth.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >> Robert, >> >> I just feel like (somehow invariably!) breaking 60 line methods into 3 >> methods of 20 lines each is not the best ultimate solution. >> >> As for the "real world" ...this is too funny.. I must live in a different >> one than most -- I have received 2 high-priority urgent requests since my >> previous post 1 hour ago!!! >> >> The stuff I wrote even yesterday will have to wait. Ha! ha! >> >> Warren >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "golang-nuts" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/e8fbdb4e-1d02-42c5-9c1e-409a846caaa4%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/E0F666E8-1225-4655-BF6C-1C5F679899E0%40ix.netcom.com.