In the specific case you cite, it seems doubtful to me that you couldn’t 
properly test a 60 line method fully externally/black box

> On Mar 2, 2020, at 3:32 PM, Robert Engels <reng...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> That’s where people management. Seasoned vets are better off devoting energy 
> to changing things than fighting fires - much better in the long run imo. 
> 
>>> On Mar 2, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Warren Stephens <wsteph...@prognoshealth.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>> 
>> Robert,
>> 
>> I just feel like (somehow invariably!) breaking 60 line methods into 3 
>> methods of 20 lines each is not the best ultimate solution.
>> 
>> As for the "real world" ...this is too funny.. I must live in a different 
>> one than most -- I have received 2 high-priority urgent requests since my 
>> previous post 1 hour ago!!!
>> 
>> The stuff I wrote even yesterday will have to wait.  Ha! ha!
>> 
>> Warren
>>  
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/e8fbdb4e-1d02-42c5-9c1e-409a846caaa4%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/E0F666E8-1225-4655-BF6C-1C5F679899E0%40ix.netcom.com.

Reply via email to